Oakmont Trail

Share Oakmont Trail on Facebook Share Oakmont Trail on Twitter Share Oakmont Trail on Linkedin Email Oakmont Trail link

Consultation has concluded

Aerial View of Oakmont neighborhood


Welcome to the Oakmont Trail Project

This project will ask residents for their input about the potential options for completion of the Red Willow Trail System along and into the Oakmont neighbourhood.

The project is divided into three segments:

  1. Old Bellerose Trail
  2. Oak Point to Otter Crescent
  3. Oakbay Point to Botanica

We are eager to work with you to better understand your views on the pros, cons and trade-offs of different ways to complete this area of the Red Willow Trail system.

We will keep you informed, listen to and acknowledge your concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. We will seek your feedback on drafts and proposals.



Welcome to the Oakmont Trail Project

This project will ask residents for their input about the potential options for completion of the Red Willow Trail System along and into the Oakmont neighbourhood.

The project is divided into three segments:

  1. Old Bellerose Trail
  2. Oak Point to Otter Crescent
  3. Oakbay Point to Botanica

We are eager to work with you to better understand your views on the pros, cons and trade-offs of different ways to complete this area of the Red Willow Trail system.

We will keep you informed, listen to and acknowledge your concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. We will seek your feedback on drafts and proposals.


Consultation has concluded

Questions will be responded to as received and project team responses will be shared through this forum as appropriate. 

  • Share Besides BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing, who stands to financially benefit from the creation of the north side trail? How much money has BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing promised to contribute to the creation of the trail? on Facebook Share Besides BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing, who stands to financially benefit from the creation of the north side trail? How much money has BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing promised to contribute to the creation of the trail? on Twitter Share Besides BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing, who stands to financially benefit from the creation of the north side trail? How much money has BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing promised to contribute to the creation of the trail? on Linkedin Email Besides BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing, who stands to financially benefit from the creation of the north side trail? How much money has BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing promised to contribute to the creation of the trail? link

    Besides BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing, who stands to financially benefit from the creation of the north side trail? How much money has BDL/BCL/Riverbank Landing promised to contribute to the creation of the trail?

    Doug asked about 2 years ago

    Thank you for your question.  Trails are generally primarily a social benefit that improves quality of life, health of residents and improves environmental outcomes as an active transportation option.  There can be indirect or spin-off economic benefits to trails, related to attractiveness of communities for residential investment, access to commercial areas or as a tourism benefit but those are generally related to connected trail systems as a whole (such our Red Willow Trail system) and long distance trails, rather than localized areas like the Oakmont Trail project specifically.   

    While we have been speaking with Boudreau Communities to align the trail called for in their Area Structure Plan amendment for Riverbank Landing with this proposed trail, there have been no specific financial negotiations nor agreements signed. As this project is first a feasibility study, and the decision to move forward has not been made, those types of discussions would be premature.  That being said, Boudreau is responsible for completing the pedestrian circulation system wtihin the Riverbank Landing and that will occur regardless of whether it connects to the Red Willow Trail system through this project or not. 

  • Share When the Red Willow Trail was developed in Oakmont, it was determined that the connecting trails (Section 2 and 3 in your feasibility study) were too environmentatlly sensitive to build. Please publish the studies completed at that time. on Facebook Share When the Red Willow Trail was developed in Oakmont, it was determined that the connecting trails (Section 2 and 3 in your feasibility study) were too environmentatlly sensitive to build. Please publish the studies completed at that time. on Twitter Share When the Red Willow Trail was developed in Oakmont, it was determined that the connecting trails (Section 2 and 3 in your feasibility study) were too environmentatlly sensitive to build. Please publish the studies completed at that time. on Linkedin Email When the Red Willow Trail was developed in Oakmont, it was determined that the connecting trails (Section 2 and 3 in your feasibility study) were too environmentatlly sensitive to build. Please publish the studies completed at that time. link

    When the Red Willow Trail was developed in Oakmont, it was determined that the connecting trails (Section 2 and 3 in your feasibility study) were too environmentatlly sensitive to build. Please publish the studies completed at that time.

    CWoodman asked about 2 years ago

    Thank for you this comment. Our project team have searched through existing files and were not able to identify any previously completed environmental assessments for this area specifically that would relate to potential trail development. Some historical geotechnical information was found, which was evaluated within this study. We have heard some residents recollection that additional studies may have been done, potentially by private land developers but have not been able to identify a source. If you have further information on when these studies occurred or who may have completed them, we can certainly continue our search.  The studies under being carried out this project are intended to ensure a robust understanding of the current state of the area however and are being completed by qualified third party professionals. 

  • Share Your site states that public engagement begins January 17, 2022. How was that accomplished? How are the public being advised about this project throughout the process? Was Riverbank Landing condo board or Boudreau Communities consulted with prior to other residents? on Facebook Share Your site states that public engagement begins January 17, 2022. How was that accomplished? How are the public being advised about this project throughout the process? Was Riverbank Landing condo board or Boudreau Communities consulted with prior to other residents? on Twitter Share Your site states that public engagement begins January 17, 2022. How was that accomplished? How are the public being advised about this project throughout the process? Was Riverbank Landing condo board or Boudreau Communities consulted with prior to other residents? on Linkedin Email Your site states that public engagement begins January 17, 2022. How was that accomplished? How are the public being advised about this project throughout the process? Was Riverbank Landing condo board or Boudreau Communities consulted with prior to other residents? link

    Your site states that public engagement begins January 17, 2022. How was that accomplished? How are the public being advised about this project throughout the process? Was Riverbank Landing condo board or Boudreau Communities consulted with prior to other residents?

    CWoodman asked about 2 years ago

    Thank you for your question.  Public engagement was advertised in several ways including publication on the City website, through the City's Cultivate the Conversation platform, through City social media and advertising and through mailouts to landowners directly adjacent to the proposed trail alignment.  

    Additionally the project team reached out directly to the Botanica Condominium Board (please see the What We Heard report under Key Documents on this site) and presented at a Board meeting on January 6th due to timing of their board meetings.  The information shared on January 6th does not differ from those materials shared during this phase of public engagement.  

    We have been working with Boudreau Developments,  as part of the proposal crosses private lands held by Boudreau. 

    Additional meetings with St. Albert-Sturgeon Metis Local and Poundmaker's Lodge will also occur as part of this process. 

  • Share Why was a proper environmental assessment not completed considering the sensitivity of the habitat? Wildlife surveys were not done (using old data from a site further down the river is not acceptable since the habitat is different), rare plant surveys were not done, and vegetation/wetland surveys were completed a few days before the end of AEP's acceptable growing season period. Surveys should have been completed during the appropriate time periods based on the survey type and should not have been dictated by the City's schedule. Also, your environmental consultant should update their regulatory information. For instance the migratory bird restricted activity window (as per Environment and Climate Change Canada) for the St. Albert area is April 19 - August 29, not April 20 - August 20. Incorrect information like this makes one question the validity of their study. on Facebook Share Why was a proper environmental assessment not completed considering the sensitivity of the habitat? Wildlife surveys were not done (using old data from a site further down the river is not acceptable since the habitat is different), rare plant surveys were not done, and vegetation/wetland surveys were completed a few days before the end of AEP's acceptable growing season period. Surveys should have been completed during the appropriate time periods based on the survey type and should not have been dictated by the City's schedule. Also, your environmental consultant should update their regulatory information. For instance the migratory bird restricted activity window (as per Environment and Climate Change Canada) for the St. Albert area is April 19 - August 29, not April 20 - August 20. Incorrect information like this makes one question the validity of their study. on Twitter Share Why was a proper environmental assessment not completed considering the sensitivity of the habitat? Wildlife surveys were not done (using old data from a site further down the river is not acceptable since the habitat is different), rare plant surveys were not done, and vegetation/wetland surveys were completed a few days before the end of AEP's acceptable growing season period. Surveys should have been completed during the appropriate time periods based on the survey type and should not have been dictated by the City's schedule. Also, your environmental consultant should update their regulatory information. For instance the migratory bird restricted activity window (as per Environment and Climate Change Canada) for the St. Albert area is April 19 - August 29, not April 20 - August 20. Incorrect information like this makes one question the validity of their study. on Linkedin Email Why was a proper environmental assessment not completed considering the sensitivity of the habitat? Wildlife surveys were not done (using old data from a site further down the river is not acceptable since the habitat is different), rare plant surveys were not done, and vegetation/wetland surveys were completed a few days before the end of AEP's acceptable growing season period. Surveys should have been completed during the appropriate time periods based on the survey type and should not have been dictated by the City's schedule. Also, your environmental consultant should update their regulatory information. For instance the migratory bird restricted activity window (as per Environment and Climate Change Canada) for the St. Albert area is April 19 - August 29, not April 20 - August 20. Incorrect information like this makes one question the validity of their study. link

    Why was a proper environmental assessment not completed considering the sensitivity of the habitat? Wildlife surveys were not done (using old data from a site further down the river is not acceptable since the habitat is different), rare plant surveys were not done, and vegetation/wetland surveys were completed a few days before the end of AEP's acceptable growing season period. Surveys should have been completed during the appropriate time periods based on the survey type and should not have been dictated by the City's schedule. Also, your environmental consultant should update their regulatory information. For instance the migratory bird restricted activity window (as per Environment and Climate Change Canada) for the St. Albert area is April 19 - August 29, not April 20 - August 20. Incorrect information like this makes one question the validity of their study.

    Not that kind of doctor asked over 2 years ago

    Thank you for your comments. The biophysical assessment was completed by Spencer Environmental, a highly reputable and qualified firm.  We will have them double check and update the dates you have noted and appreciate you bringing that potential error to our attention.

    As Spencer noted within the report, additional studies may be required if the project is advanced.  We are also collecting additional information through this public engagement phase, asking for public knowledge of the area with a citizen science lens, working with Indigenous partners on potential traditional knowledge of the area and using the experience and expertise of our staff who work within the Sturgeon River corridor daily. 

    We greatly appreciate your passion and for taking the time to share your concerns with the project team. Balancing human use with the the importance of the Sturgeon River valley as a key wildlife corridor and habitat for many species is not simple and many different perspectives are needed to make sustainable decisions.  If you want to discuss further, please do not hesitate to reach out to one of the project team members listed in the Who's Listening information section of this page.  We would also encourage to attend our virtual public open house on January 27, 2022. 

  • Share Why are you even suggesting changing Old Bellerose Dr. We back on to it and use it daily. It is perfect the way it is!!! Our fave spot in St. Albert. Keep some things natural, enough room for everyone the way it is. Humans walking/jogging/biking/walking dogs, moose and coyotes and all the wildlife. on Facebook Share Why are you even suggesting changing Old Bellerose Dr. We back on to it and use it daily. It is perfect the way it is!!! Our fave spot in St. Albert. Keep some things natural, enough room for everyone the way it is. Humans walking/jogging/biking/walking dogs, moose and coyotes and all the wildlife. on Twitter Share Why are you even suggesting changing Old Bellerose Dr. We back on to it and use it daily. It is perfect the way it is!!! Our fave spot in St. Albert. Keep some things natural, enough room for everyone the way it is. Humans walking/jogging/biking/walking dogs, moose and coyotes and all the wildlife. on Linkedin Email Why are you even suggesting changing Old Bellerose Dr. We back on to it and use it daily. It is perfect the way it is!!! Our fave spot in St. Albert. Keep some things natural, enough room for everyone the way it is. Humans walking/jogging/biking/walking dogs, moose and coyotes and all the wildlife. link

    Why are you even suggesting changing Old Bellerose Dr. We back on to it and use it daily. It is perfect the way it is!!! Our fave spot in St. Albert. Keep some things natural, enough room for everyone the way it is. Humans walking/jogging/biking/walking dogs, moose and coyotes and all the wildlife.

    AmyRae asked over 2 years ago

    Thank you for your comments and for sharing how you use and enjoy the Old Bellerose alignment as it is now.  We have identified some potential benefits to changing the gravel road to a more standard 3m asphalt trail, including a smoother surface for those with mobility challenges, the ability to clear the trail in winter and opportunities to add more naturalized plantings along the alignment and create more tree canopy.  There are also certainly benefits to leaving the area as is and we thank you for your feedback as we consider the best course of action for this segment.