Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c)
Share Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) on FacebookShare Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) on X (formerly Twitter)Share Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) on LinkedinEmail Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) link
Consultation has concluded
About the Project
Select Engineering Consultants Ltd., on behalf of Landrex, submitted an application to amend Land Use Bylaw 9/2005, by removing regulation 8.21(c). Land Use Bylaw regulation 8.21(c) requires that lots less than 11.5 metres in width shall be located on through streets only. The Land Use Bylaw defines ‘through street’ as:
“A public roadway built to City standards, other than a lane, that has two separate points of ingress and egress. A lane cannot serve as a secondary route for ingress and egress.”
Non-through street designs, such as cul-de-sacs or p-loops, must have lots 11.5 metres in width or wider at this time.
If regulation 8.21(c) were removed, smaller lots could be subdivided on non-through streets, and more compact housing products with front driveway access could be placed on non-through street designs like cul-de-sacs and p-loops.
For full details, please see the public circulation letter. This letter, and figures 1 to 4, are available in the Key Documents section on the right-hand side of this page.
The circulation closed on March 3, 2022. To view the public feedback, please see the What You Said and What We Heard Reports, available under the Key Documents heading.
About the Project
Select Engineering Consultants Ltd., on behalf of Landrex, submitted an application to amend Land Use Bylaw 9/2005, by removing regulation 8.21(c). Land Use Bylaw regulation 8.21(c) requires that lots less than 11.5 metres in width shall be located on through streets only. The Land Use Bylaw defines ‘through street’ as:
“A public roadway built to City standards, other than a lane, that has two separate points of ingress and egress. A lane cannot serve as a secondary route for ingress and egress.”
Non-through street designs, such as cul-de-sacs or p-loops, must have lots 11.5 metres in width or wider at this time.
If regulation 8.21(c) were removed, smaller lots could be subdivided on non-through streets, and more compact housing products with front driveway access could be placed on non-through street designs like cul-de-sacs and p-loops.
For full details, please see the public circulation letter. This letter, and figures 1 to 4, are available in the Key Documents section on the right-hand side of this page.
The circulation closed on March 3, 2022. To view the public feedback, please see the What You Said and What We Heard Reports, available under the Key Documents heading.
Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) has finished this stage
This consultation is open for contributions until March 3, 2022.
Under Review
Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) has finished this stage
Contributions to this consultation are closed for evaluation and review. The project team will report back on key outcomes.
Report on Public Consultation
Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) has finished this stage
The outcomes of the public consultation are documented here. This may include a summary of all contributions collected as well as recommendations for future action.
Council - Public Hearing
Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) has finished this stage
The Planning Branch writes a report and bylaw to Council, based on the technical and public comments, and schedules a Public Hearing date. At the Public Hearing, the public can speak to Council about their opinions on the proposal. After the Public Hearing, Council will vote on whether to approve or refuse the application. The tentative date for the public hearing is February 20, 2024.
Council - Decision
Land Use Bylaw Amendment, Remove Regulation 8.21(c) is currently at this stage
If Council votes to refuse the application, the process ends. If Council gives Second and Third Readings to the Bylaw, the amendment can be accepted.